2007-07-16 - 1:35 p.m.
I had a very dynamic discussion with a friend over the weekend. In discussing theories I am just barely familiar with in physics, my curiosity was peaked about the validity, or better yet, the meanings of certain principals being debated in the physics communities. I decided to read up on it a little and in turning it over in my head, I came up with a question. If anyone out there actually reads this blog, or maybe in some future point I will be that "anyone", would you please help shed some light on this thought:
Can gravitons be described, not as emitted Lagrangian particles, but rather as differences (or gradient inequivalences) in the amount of potential energy imposed by the number of non-zero mass particles in one relatively close location which then exert extra-dimensional forces (extra= outside of the matrix of the 3+1) causing perturbations in the Loop-Quantum-Gravity perspective of the vacuated 3+1 dimensional gauge supersymmetric matrix?
In other words, if you view the quantized spacetime (LQG) vacuum, can you consider the extradimensional points of existence on any point in that system, to be exerting non-zero mass potential energy changes in the supersymmetry of the system, causing a potential energy difference, and hence, an up-gradient "force" of energy between that one point of perturbation and any one other such point? Hence, if a completely vacuated 3+1 matrix were conceptualized as perfectly spherical and not curved space, it would be the existence of two non-zero particles exerting a potential energy gradient difference that would be bending or curving the matrix (I use "potential" meaning that any non-zero mass particle has the capacity to become pure energy). Therein, it could also be postulated that the W-bosons and gluons are not actually present until the gravitational potential energy between any two non-zero mass particles of distinctly-defined proximity is destroyed (by experimentation), and that the Electroweak and Strong nuclear forces are really just extremely localized forms of gravitation.
To consider this idea, it is necessary to view the vacuuated matrix as a stationary constant that makes up the 3+1 dimensional space, and to consider that matrix to be quantized. In the same reference vantage, it is necessary to view the existence of non-zero particles as local additions (or extra-M-branal deviations) to the 3+1 dimensions and, therein, multidimensional sources of energetic (potential to do work, i.e., emit or cause gravitational potentials) perturbations in the supersymmetry of the stationary and constant quantized matrix.
As a final note, this idea would thereby correspond to a unified field theory of only the Strong and ElectroWeak forces, since gravity would then be exra-particulate and only a result of extra-dimentional perturbative energy potential. Gravity would then be only a mathematical principle, non-detectable and instantaneous, and hence, not regulated by the special relativity theory. Hence, being outside of our calculable matter-energy reletivistic equations, gravity would not be bound by the speed of light. However, if in trying to understand this idea with relation to the theories of general relativity and loop quantum gravity, it could be conceived that point source non-zero particles are space-time locations of p-brane-interaction, and extra-dimensional sources of localized energetic quanta for every point in space wherein non-zero particles exists. Even further expanded, it can be postulated that the reason for the existence of the vacuated spacetime matrix stems from the actual iteractions of the p-brane point sources. In other words, supermembranes can, theoretically, have non-interacting areas that could potentially give rise to new supersymmetrical matrices, but they only remain as potential areas because there is no branal interaction, and the reason for the existence of matrices is to serve as vessels for the existence of non-zero particles (localized areas of the interaction of the p-branes).
This gives rise to the catch-22 idea that were there no non-zero particles in the matrix, there would be no matrix, and vice versa!
�
�
